Skip To Main Content

Search Panel

Schools Menu

School Improvement Plan

What is a School Improvement Plan?

A School Improvement Plan (SIP) is a strategic blueprint that schools use to enhance student learning and improve educational practices. It outlines specific goals for improvement, actions to achieve those goals, and methods for measuring progress.

Key Points of a SIP:

  • Goals: Clear objectives the school aims to achieve to enhance student outcomes.
  • Actions: Steps and strategies the school will implement to reach its goals, based on research and effective practices.
  • Monitoring: Regular review of progress with adjustments made to ensure the school stays on track toward its improvement objectives.
     

The purpose of a SIP is to provide a clear roadmap for schools to improve educational outcomes for all students, particularly focusing on eliminating disparities and ensuring equitable opportunities for every student.

Every school in Washington State is required to have a School Improvement Plan.

Visit the Issaquah School District SIP website to learn more about SIPs.

District - School Improvement Plans

 

Front of Sunset Elementary School

Sunset Elementary School Improvement Plan

2024-2026

Strengths, Challenges, & Opportunities

Root Cause and Contributing Factors of Disproportionality

ISD recognizes that not all students benefit equally or achieve equitably within our district. Our outcome measures such as graduation rate, proficiency on assessments, and grades indicate that we are not achieving equitable results for students in identified ethnic and racial groups, students who are experiencing economic hardships, and students with disabilities. 

ISD is committed to disrupting patterns that result in inequitable outcomes. Global (across time and place) and local factors contribute to inequitable outcomes in our District, including the following: 

  • Institutional racism and ableism 
  • Impacts of economic hardship, including mobility or discontinuity of education 
  • Impacts of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs)  
  • Lack of consistent access to preventative and responsive services when experiencing ACEs 
  • Lack of consistent access to adequate supports designed to address basic and individual educational needs 
  • Lack of consistent access to high quality, inclusive, universally designed, and culturally responsive education 

Reflection & Theory of Action

Backed by Data

Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Timebound, Inclusive, Equity-focused goals aligned to the Academic Opportunities priority area of the ISD 3-year strategic plan, referencing data from the School Improvement Data Dashboard.

Data Workbook for Elementary School

Note:

  • The BIPOC Focus group includes students in the 4 federal race groups with ongoing disproportionate outcomes: Native American, African American, Hispanic, and Pacific Islander.
  • Students with Disabilities includes students with an Individual Education Plan, served in Special Services programs.
  • *OSPI has not released official attendance data as of the date of completion of this form, December 2024.

School-Based Action Plan

Programs and priorities listed below are being implemented, expanded or sustained during this 2-year SIP cycle at each of our elementary schools as part of the ISD Strategic Plan priorities and the establishment of Integrated Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS).  For this SIP cycle, schools will select 3 strategies, including the Implementation of Benchmark Advance Literacy, and at least one other from district-wide program or system listed, and describe their school’s implementation plan and strategies for monitoring impact. Be sure to relate actions plans to the 3 SIP goal areas.

Implementation of Benchmark Advance Literacy. Launch new literacy curriculum that integrates science of reading strategies with comprehension strategies for all students to engage in close reading of grade level text. ISD Priority 2a,c

Select 1-2 of the following to describe in further detail:

Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Implementation of UDL as a framework of evidence-based, inclusive, and culturally responsive instructional practices for Tier 1. ISD Priority 2a

Tiered Teams. Implementation of a Tiered Team structure to examine integrated social-emotional and academic achievement data to adjust core instruction and/or intervention planning. ISD Priority 2b

Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS) / Social-Emotional Learning (SEL). Maintaining or enhancing school-wide systems of support and social emotional learning to increase belonging, well-being, and create the conditions for learning.   ISD Priority 1

Classroom-Based Intervention & Block Scheduling. Implementation of targeted supports, accommodations, and interventions (Tier 2) through classroom-based interventions, coordination of supplemental programs, in implementation of block scheduling. ISD Priority 2b

Inclusionary Practices. Collaboration and coordination of classroom teachers and special education staff to provide a comprehensive continuum of inclusive services within the least restrictive educational environment to ensure that all students reach their full potential.  ISD Priority 2b

Multilingual Learners support. With the understanding that the whole day is an inclusive language learning experience for all students, collaboration and coordination of classroom teachers and multilingual learner specialists to deliver language acquisition strategies, ensure multilingual students have access to all instruction and learning, in  a language intensive learning environment so that they achieve their full potential.  ISD Priority 2b

Action Implementation Impact: Evidence/Monitoring

Implementation of Benchmark Advance Literacy

Training

  • All staff will participate in ISD district training
  • All teaching staff will meet on a determined schedule with the school implementation specialist
  • Training parents through a literacy event in the fall to learn about Benchmark Advance and how they can support literacy at home

Teaming

Recommendation: describe how and how often teams commit to discuss Benchmark Advance assessment data and implications for implementation centered on the following questions:

  1. What do we want all students to know and be able to do?
  2. How do we know if they learn it?
  3. How are we responding when some students do not learn it?
  4. How do we extend learning when students demonstrate mastery?

Integrity of Delivery

  • Use of implementation goals provided by Benchmark / Teaching & Learning Services
  • Collaboration in planning the literacy blocks

Resources Allocation

  • Implementation specialist (district)
  • Dedicated staff meeting time to training & collaboration
  • Commitment of team meeting time
Note: it may make sense to revisit this after the August training

Intended Impacts

  • Increase in reading decoding, fluency, vocabulary and comprehension
  • Increase in proficiency with grammar, writing structure, and effective communication of ideas in writing
  • Acceleration of achievement in key gap areas including phonics, overall reading, written expression

Key Data

  • i-Ready Phonics & Overall Reading
  • Achievement of stretch growth goals / accelerated growth for students scoring below standard in fall/prior spring.
  • Maintaining proficiency for students scoring at standard (level 3) in fall/prior spring.
  • Progress as monitored through embedded assessments:
    • Benchmark Performance Tasks
    • Benchmark week 2 assessments for each unit
    • RFS Assessments and Title/LAP progress monitoring

 

 

Classroom-Based Intervention & Block Scheduling

Block Scheduling

  • Grade level teams have math success block at the same time
  • Math and literacy at common grade level times to support push-in for supplemental services

Training

  • Participate in supports offered by Implementation Specialist (literacy)
  • Participate in math instructional unit planning using UDL strategies
  • PD on math foundational skills instruction to utilize during the math success block time
  • Continued grade level collaboration and planning

Staffing

  • LRC teachers for each grade level team
  • Built in time for collaboration and planning
  • LRC and MLL push-in
  • Implementation Specialist support
  • 2.5 Title/LAP Intervention staff to support literacy and math groups across grade levels

Intended Impacts

  • Closing achievement gaps
  • Increased best practices
  • Increased alignment among grade level teams
  • Increased rigor to standards-based instruction
  • Increased integration
  • Increased time for all students to access core learning (push-in)

 

Key Data

  • i-Ready data
  • Common assessments (new to Benchmark)
  • Eureka mid and end-of-module assessments
  • SBA data

Additional School Improvement Plan Components

Family engagement

ISD Priority 4

Action

  • Meet the Teacher
  • Curriculum Night and Family Conferences
  • Family Math Night
  • PTA events throughout the school year
  • Utilize family members to volunteer and support in classrooms and for field trip experiences
  • Language Line, Alboum, Google Translate
  • WaKIDS Connections Meetings in Kindergarten

Intended Impacts

  • Increase sense of belonging
  • Strengthen family – school relationships

Key Data

  • SAEBRS data
  • Annual Family Survey
  • 3-5 Grade Students Annual Survey

Technology Integration

Personalized Learning

Teachers use district technology tools such as Seesaw, Book Creator, Microsoft tools, and Canva to present content in multiple ways and to allow students to demonstrate mastery using multiple means of expression. These adaptive learning platforms enable teachers to utilize Universal Design for Learning principles, which in turn help close gaps for students disproportionately impacted by one-size-fits-all instruction.

Access to Resources

Teachers use tech tools to provide widespread access to learning materials, including standards-aligned online lessons via Zearn, Benchmark, Amplify, or i-Ready, e-books via Learning Ally or Sora, or age-appropriate digital research databases such as PebbleGo or World Book Online. Access to these resources continues outside the school day, removing barriers for families and allowing students opportunities for additional review and practice of new skills and concepts.

Assistive Technologies

Teachers use tools like speech-to-text, screen readers, and customizable user interfaces help students with disabilities or language barriers to fully participate in learning, promoting inclusivity and equity.

Project-Based and Creative Tools  

Sunset teachers utilize multimedia creation tools (Seesaw, Book Creator, Canva, Microsoft tools), coding environments (BrainPop coding, code.org), and collaborative software (Microsoft Teams, Book Creator) to give students varied ways to express learning. These foster creativity and give students from diverse backgrounds more opportunities to succeed beyond traditional methods.

Intended Impacts

  • Increase student engagement in learning.
  • Reduce barriers and provide access to learning.

Key Data

  • Track data on learning platform/digital tool usage through Clever
  • i-Ready and Benchmark Assessments to track the impact on student learning
  • Tracking academic outcomes for students who are using technology as part of a tier 2 intervention

School Improvement Team & Procedure Information

Principal

LeAnn Tuupo

SIP Team Members

Christine Vo, Assistant Principal, Kaeleigh Wilson, MTSS Specialist, Leilani Kollasch, Implementation Specialist, Jodi Skroch, Kinder Teacher, Jenny McKenny, 1st grade Teacher, Marie Blakely-Arthur, 2nd grade Teacher, Jenny Rodabough, 3rd grade Teacher, Marissa Grace, 4th grade Teacher, Kiera Brunson, 5th Grade Teacher

Supervisor Review

Susan Mundell, November 14, 2024

Site Council or PTSA Review

October 2024

School Board Review

December 3, 2024